Home

Tue, Mar. 4th, 2008, 04:05 pm
The $2 Trillion Nightmare

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/04/opinion/04herbert.html

On Thursday, the Joint Economic Committee, chaired by Senator Chuck Schumer, conducted a public examination of the costs of the war. The witnesses included the Nobel Prize-winning economist, Joseph Stiglitz (who believes the overall costs of the war, not just the cost to taxpayers, will reach $3 trillion), and Robert Hormats, vice chairman of Goldman Sachs International.

Both men talked about large opportunities lost because of the money poured into the war. "For a fraction of the cost of this war," said Mr. Stiglitz, "we could have put Social Security on a sound footing for the next half-century or more."

Mr. Hormats mentioned Social Security and Medicare, saying that both could have been put "on a more sustainable basis". And he cited the committee's own calculations from last fall that showed that the money spent on the war each day is enough to enroll an additional 58,000 children in Head Start for a year, or make a year of college affordable for 160,000 low-income students through Pell Grants, or pay the annual salaries of nearly 11,000 additional border patrol agents or 14,000 more police officers.


Remember, that's per day, and the war has gone on for almost 1500 days now.

http://matthewyglesias.theatlantic.com/archives/2008/03/the_cost_of_war_2.php

Few people seem to appreciate it, but it’s quite literally true that al-Qaeda's strategy is to cripple the U.S. economy by dragging us into quagmires abroad. Osama bin Laden himself has said this, and it's the only strategy that makes sense. A smallish number of people with no base of resources can't possibly defeat us unless we shoot ourselves in the foot repeatedly as Bush and McCain propose.

Tue, Mar. 4th, 2008 11:17 pm (UTC)
[info]reanimated

unbelievable. THIS is how the terrorists win.

Tue, Mar. 4th, 2008 11:21 pm (UTC)
[info]paradox0220

Agree completely. I wish we would have taken a lion's share of that money and invested in new energy sources (and energy storage technology) to break the oil dependency that got us into this mess to start with.

Plus, as the US became the world leader in new energy sources (probably green, renewable, etc), we could reap great monetary rewards by selling products/technology to other countries. Win all around.

Wed, Mar. 5th, 2008 08:22 am (UTC)
[info]goulo

Mission accomplished! Stay the course!

It's interesting and sad how most people ignore the often quite clear statements of al-Qaeda et al (e.g. that we should quit interfering in the Middle East and setting up puppet governments and starting wars - pretty reasonable grievances, if you ask me), and instead they just continue to blather that the terrorists "hate us for our freedom" and will invade us and force us all to speak Arabic etc.

Edited at 2008-03-05 08:25 am (UTC)